It would appear that the Democrats are becoming increasingly unnerved, to put it mildly, regarding their prospects of being able to avoid what is very likely to be, for them this November, an electoral massacre. I always view it as being a bit juvenile, whenever I hear some Democrat National Committee (DNC) malcontent describe something as being "undemocratic." And usually for no other reason than because it’s something that does not, in some way, benefit the Democrat Party. Because, you see, to Democrats, all things must be made to benefit Democrats.
So it was then that we recently heard from someone identified as being a spokesmoron for the DNC, some clone by the name of Mo Elleithee, who told reporters on a conference call, "We believe that we should expand democracy -- that expanding democracy is good for the nation; it is good for our party." It was during this same call that this boob attacked, as being "undemocratic", many of the Republican voter ID laws and other state-level election laws. I guess he’s somehow concerned that this may, in some way, be a concerted effort to disenfranchise the dead.
Anyway it was also during this call that those under the employ of the DNC offered up a number of idiotic platitudes about the importance of voting, which was scheduled, coincidentally I’m quite sure, at the same time as a recent New York Times story on Republican-supported election laws. But strangely enough, they kept slipping up and mentioning their ulterior concern. That being, their concern over what is likely to be a relatively low voter turnout for them. "The fundamental notion is that lower turnout means that we'll lose, and so we've got to drive it up as much as possible," Elleithee said.
And then we have Maggie Toulouse Oliver, a Democrat candidate for New Mexico Secretary of State, who explained that she believes telling voters that Republicans are trying to deprive them of the right to vote could prove to motivate Democrat voters to go to the polls later this year. So in other words, Democrats would, as a tactic, simply choose to lie to people in the hopes of providing enough motivation to get their brain-dead, parasitic constituents to go to the polls. It’s unusual to see them being so upfront about such a thing. Usually they’re busy accusing the other side of doing all the lying.
It was in referring to a list of people whose voting eligibility was questioned by the state government that Maggie said that "those individuals in particular are going to be targeted by me or by other campaigns saying, you know, 'Did you know that your right to vote was almost taken away?'" Now to me what that tells me is that old Maggie, here, is nothing but a soulless hag who possesses zero character. But in trying to motivate Democrats such a flaw most likely works to her advantage. After all, such things as integrity and honesty aren’t attributes that those who regularly vote Democrat look for in a candidate.
Maggie went on to say, "I think actually, what could end up happening is that what happens as a result of these efforts, that these efforts completely backfire, especially with the Hispanic and Latino community, and that especially we could see increased and improved turnout as a result of that, in response to that." I suppose this is the kind of stuff that we can soon expect to be inundated with. And as the November election inches closer the level of rhetoric will also intensify. Democrats will be pulling out all the stops in their attempt to distract attention away from such things as Obamacare.
But all of this behavior does expose the Democrats for what they really are, as well as the lengths they are willing to go in their effort to hoodwink the American people, even if it’s no longer than just long enough for them to get elected. But again, most of those who vote for this scum simply don’t care about the tactics employed by those for whom they vote. All that’s really important to these people is that their free ride be maintained at all costs. What going to motivate these people to vote for one candidate over another rests solely on whether or not that candidate promises to keep the gravy train going. That’s where we are today.
No comments:
Post a Comment